Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Caio Zampieri vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zampieri vs Carabelli analysis and find out who is favored!
Caio Zampieri vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zampieri 1 - 0 Carabelli
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zampieri has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Carabelli has won 48.68%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zampieri, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Carabelli has won 55.65%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 34.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zampieri has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Carabelli has saved 60.96% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zampieri has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Carabelli winning 67.12% (W/L 49/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zampieri has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Carabelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 287/ 159), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zampieri winning 1 times and Carabelli being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zampieri winning 2 and Carabelli winning 0. The last match between Zampieri and Carabelli was at the Bolivia F3, 23-11-2016, Second, Clay with Caio Zampieri getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:1:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zampieri and Carabelli have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zampieri winning 0 times and Carabelli 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zampieri winning 0, and Carabelli 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zampieri has played against opponents with an average rank of while Carabelli has played against players with an average rank of 280.96.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zampieri has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Carabelli has won 68% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zampieri has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Carabelli has converted 46.73% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
182
High
38
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
114
Rank
96
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
59% (422-290)
Career Total W/L
63% (316-184)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
66% (27-14)
$42,800
Career Prize Money
$130,440
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Caio Zampieri | Camilo Ugo Carabelli |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:1:0 | 1:1:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (37/52) | 63% (33/52) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (25/37) | 67% (22/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (10/15) | 16% (3/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 0% (0/3) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (27/52) | 33% (17/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Caio Zampieri
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Caio Zampieri | Camilo Ugo Carabelli |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 66% (27/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (56/37) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (493/425) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 66% (25/13) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 95 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 85 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 237.41 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (1864/2965) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (1257/1864) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (536/1101) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 47% (150/321) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (1264/2994) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 78% (21/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 64% (25/39) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (10/20) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 73% (8/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (23/23) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (23/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 22% (18/4) |
Caio Zampieri Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gianni Mina
Player
Caio Zampieri
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Caio Zampieri
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alejandro Falla
Player
Caio Zampieri
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve %
69%
(
20 of
29)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
30
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gianluigi Quinzi
Player
Caio Zampieri
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caio Zampieri
Player
Andrea Arnaboldi
65%
(
72 of
110)
1st Serve %
61%
(
68 of
111)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
40 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Matthias Bachinger
Player
Caio Zampieri
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Caio Zampieri
Player
Vaclav Safranek
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Caio Zampieri
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
27 of
32)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caio Zampieri
Player
Pedja Krstin
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
35%
(
20 of
57)
9
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
15 of
20)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedja Krstin
Player
Caio Zampieri
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
79%
(
23 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
39%
(
14 of
36)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Taro Daniel
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
54%
(
30 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
15 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Orlando Luz
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Zampieri Vs Carabelli Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Zampieri are available here and Carabelli photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
